Return to Fast-Breaking News & Updates Archive

 

NHNE News Update:
More on the Face on Mars
Monday, April 20, 1998

------------

All aspects of NHNE --
our publications, award-winning website,
research, innovative projects,
inspirational stories and jokes,
and ongoing efforts to create a global network
of serious spiritual seekers
that can unravel the mysteries of human existence --
are made possible by the Friends of NHNE,
now 13 people strong.

Write "friendsofnhne@nhne.com"
to find out how you can keep NHNE
on the radar screen of planet Earth.

------------

Total NHNE Mailing List:
Last Issue Smorgasbord: 1014
This Update: 1039

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

MORE ON THE FACE ON MARS

The current issue of NEWSWEEK (4/20/98) reports:

"Last week, taking advantage of a photo op provided by some tinkering in the orbit of Mars Glabal Surveyor (now circling the Red Planet), NASA took the first new picture of the Face in two decades. The result: it doesn't look like a face anymore.

"What it does look like is a mesa with an asymmetrical top and a stick-straight edge. Why the difference? The Surveyor camera captures objects barely 15 feet across, 10 times smaller than Viking [the 1976 Martian probe] could see. The sun was higher in the sky, and the camera was at a different angle. 'It looks like a perfectly natural eroded object,' says Arden Albee, project scientist for Surveyor.

"Of course, any fan of 'The X-Files' will tell you that's exactly what NASA WOULD say. 'UFOlogists' like Richard Hoagland, head of the private Enterprise Mission, thinks NASA or a contractor doctored the image by retouching its resolution..."

So is the Face on Mars really a natural formation, as NASA scientists claim, or is it the handiwork of Martians or extraterrestrials as Hoagland, and others continue to believe? What follows is a summary from the current issue of CNI NEWS (Vol. 4, No. 4, Part 1 -- April 16, 1998) that outlines current developments in the Face on Mars controversy. It is reprinted here for members of the NHNE Mailing List by special permission.

With Love & Best Wishes,
David Sunfellow

------------

CYDONIA DISAPPOINTS, BUT CONTROVERSY CONTINUES
New Mars Images Raise More Questions Than Answers

By Michael Lindemann

With two of NASA's three promised Mars Global Surveyor images of the controversial Cydonia landforms on Mars now delivered, hopes for proof of artificial structures on the Red Planet have somewhat dimmed.

Referring to the new image of the famous "Face on Mars," some NASA scientists took an "I told you so" attitude.

"Anyone who has flown in an airplane will recognize that this (Face) is natural," MGS chief scientist Arden L. Albee of the California Institute of Technology told the Washington Post. "There will always be a few die-hards, but I think the American people will look at this and wonder what all the fuss was about."

"It's a butte, a mesa, a knob," said Michael Ravine, advanced projects manager at Malin Space Science Systems in San Diego, which operates Surveyor's camera. "Nothing jumps out at me and screams, 'This must have been built by the forces of intelligence.'"

But if anyone thought the new images would quickly settle the issue once and for all, they are gravely mistaken. The controversy rages on. The new Cydonia images are at best ambiguous and leave many questions unanswered.

Independent Cydonia researchers were quick to point out that the raw images posted to NASA's website from the Mars Global Surveyor -- an image of the famous "Face" on April 5, and an image of part of the "City" on April 14 -- left much to be desired. In both cases, contrast was low, requiring considerable enhancement to bring up recognizable features. In both cases, resolution was also lower than expected, although at least ten times better than the resolution of the famous 1976 Viking shots that started the Cydonia controversy.

In the case of the Face, important details of the structure were obscured, leaving unanswered the longstanding question of whether the Face has symmetrical features on both left and right sides. Part of the problem was camera angle. But MGS camera operator Michael Malin also pointed out that the Cydonia region was partly covered by haze, reducing available light. "The area imaged was relatively clear," Malin said, but "the lack of surface definition in many nearby areas, and the low contrast of the raw high resolution image, suggests haze or fog over much of the area."

In the case of the City, the MGS camera missed the intended target zone known as "City Square" and instead caught ambiguous mounds and hill-like features about 1.5 kilometers to the west.

Still, those who hoped the Cydonia landforms would prove intelligent activity on Mars had to admit that the surface features shown in the new images might very well be the result of natural geology and erosion.

"In the 1976 Viking images, the impression of a face was unmistakable. But illuminated from below, the Face seems less remarkable," said Dr. Mark Carlotto in his preliminary analysis of the April 5 MGS image.

Carlotto, one of the leading proponents of the theory that the Cydonia landforms are artificial, pointed out that some features in the new Face image still suggest artificiality, notably a very uniform "beveled edge" previously referred to as a "head-piece" or "helmet" encircling the Face, and what appears to be a flat, well-defined platform on which the raised features of the Face are positioned.

"But it is apparent that the Face, if it is in fact a Face, is severely eroded... Perhaps [it] can be explained geologically," Carlotto said.

Unlike Carlotto, Cydonia analyst Tom Van Flandern took a decidedly upbeat stance. "The humanoid facial features that first drew attention to this area are confirmed by this [new] photo despite poor lighting and poor viewing angle," Van Flandern wrote. "One feature, the headdress, is so much a symmetrical combination of right-angle linear and rounded features as to suggest artificiality strongly.... Other new features are so uncommon that they raise more questions than they answer. Nothing yet seen on our Moon or any other solar system surface besides Earth suggests artificiality to a comparable degree."

Professor Stanley V. McDaniel, co-founder and spokesman for The Society for Planetary SETI Research (SPSR), joined with other SPSR members on April 7 to issue a press release concerning their initial impressions of the new Face image. McDaniel, whose now-famous 1993 "McDaniel Report" accused NASA of purposely ignoring the potential importance of Cydonia, offered some perspective on the scientific process of evaluating the new images.

"We've been studying the Cydonian region of Mars for two decades," he said. "It has taken us that long to produce the statistical studies and image analysis that allow us to conclude there's a high probability that some of the Cydonia features may be nonrandom or even artificial. We're thrilled that NASA and JPL have worked so hard to produce these images.

"Science takes time, so we'll be analyzing... the Mars Global Surveyor images of Cydonia with great care to discover whether they confirm or disconfirm our findings.

"With the arrival of new images from the Global Surveyor, there will... be a temptation to make premature conclusions. No one image of the Face will end the controversy because of the two-dozen or so other anomalous formations in the region which form the basis of many of our statistical conclusions," McDaniel said.

Prior to the arrival of the new MGS images, McDaniel and other SPSR scientists, including Dr. Mark Carlotto and Dr. Horace Crater, had confidently stated that the odds were thousands-to-one in favor of artificial structures at Cydonia.

Richard Hoagland, perhaps the most outspoken of all Cydonia researchers, wasted no time accusing NASA of obscuring the truth. "Two-thirds of the data is missing" from the image of the Face, Hoagland said, referring to the low contrast in the MGS raw data, which appears to deliver only about 80 out of a possible 256 shades of gray. The picture is "crap" and "useless," according to Hoagland.

But most other analysts seem ready to accept the MGS images as straightfoward and unretouched, an honest attempt by NASA to fulfill its public promise to reimage Cydonia, for better or worse.

Glenn E. Cunningham of Jet Propulsion Laboratory, manager of the Global Surveyor project, emphasized that NASA had purposely posted the raw data as fast as possible, even though to an untrained eye that data might look very unimpressive.

"There've been charges of conspiracy and manipulating the data and we want to make it very clear to everybody that no such activity goes on here," Cunningham said.

As for NASA's official attitude on the face, he added, "We're taking a neutral stand."

With the Face still ambiguous, hopes shifted to other features in the nearby "City," features that Carlotto and others have said are actually of greater interest than the Face. Notable among these features is the so-called "City Square," a formation of four small mounds arranged in what appears to be a perfect square, clearly visible in the 1976 Viking image. A large "Main Pyramid" north of the square, and the so-called "Fortress" just east of the main pyramid, are also of great interest.

"Being more geometrical in shape, these objects, if they are artificial, may have retained enough of their architecture to be recognizable, even in a degraded condition," Carlotto says.

Mars Global Surveyor was to have targeted the City Square on its second imaging attempt on April 14. Had it been properly aimed, the new image would probably have captured the Square, the Main Pyramid and at least part of the Fort. However, MGS missed its target by about 1.5 kilometers. The features it did capture are of marginal interest and, on first inspection, seem unlikely to demonstrate artificiality.

Remaining hopes now shift to the next imaging attempt, scheduled for April 23. As of this writing, available information suggests that MGS will once again target the City with the intent of capturing more provocative features.

It is not clear that MGS will produce any more high-resolution images of the Cydonia region after the current three imaging attempts this month. However, according to a statement from CNN science correspondent John Holloman, reported by Jeff Rense on his nationally syndicated program "Sightings on the Radio," NASA chief administrator Daniel Goldin has offered new assurances that the Cydonia region will be photographed repeatedly, "until the people are satisfied."

Summarizing the current situation, Professor McDaniel says, "While we are both pleased and perplexed with the long awaited new data from Cydonia, we encourage the entire scientific community to join with the SPSR in using standard scientific analytical techniques before announcing conclusions about the area's possible artificial nature. With the release of new images by JPL, SPSR plans to conduct an intensive multi-disciplinary analysis of the data in order to understand what, if anything, might have once occurred at Cydonia. It is the intention of SPSR to make these results available to the media in a timely, accurate, and responsible manner."

CNI News will report the latest results from the upcoming third MGS imaging attempt and the ongoing analysis of the new images in our May 1 edition.

For updated image enhancements and further analysis, see:
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/marsnews/mgs/cydonia/
http://www.sun.com/mars/mgs/target/CYD2/index.html
http://www.metaresearch.org/announce/pa45-cyd.htm
http://www.psrw.com/~markc/MiscArticles/April5anal/index.html
http://www.mcdanielreport.com/mgsface.htm
http://www.enterprisemission.com/

------------

TO RECEIVE TO FREE ISSUES OF CNI NEWS: Send a request to "CNINews1@aol.com" with the message "Try News."

TO SUBSCRIBE TO CNI NEWS: Choose six months (12 issues) for $12, or twelve months (24 issues) for $24. You can pay by check or money order, or by credit card (VISA, MasterCard, Discover, American Express). If paying by check or money order, make payable to CNI NEWS and mail to: CNI NEWS, 2100 W. Drake Rd. #277, Fort Collins, CO, 80526, USA. IMPORTANT: Include your EMAIL address with your payment. To subscribe by credit card, you can call toll-free: 1-800-898-0284; or email the following information to "CNINews1@aol.com": Your full name, email address, postal address, type of credit card, card number, expiration date, and daytime phone number (in case of a problem with your order). Be SURE to tell us whether you're paying $12 (for six months) or $24 (full year).

CNI NEWS:
http://www.cninews.com/

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Please feel free to share this special NHNE News Update with as many people as you like. If you do share this NHNE News Update with others, we ask that you reproduce it in its entirety (including all credits, copyright notices and addresses), not alter its contents in any way, and pass it on to others free of charge.

------------

Founder, Publisher & Editor: David Sunfellow
News Director: James Gregory
SwiftWing Reporters & Researchers:
Sherry Stultz, Sherri Anderson
NHNE & NewEarthNet WebMaster: Noel Fray
Director of Accounting & Fund Raising: Diane (Di) Ayers

NewHeavenNewEarth (NHNE)
P.O. Box 2242
Sedona, AZ, USA 86339

http://www.nhne.com/
nhne@nhne.com

Phone, Fax & Order:
(928) 282-6120

NHNE is a proud member of
the NewEarthNet Planetary Transformation Network:
http://nen.sedona.net/members.html

------------

The mission of NewHeavenNewEarth (NHNE) is to discover the truth about human existence and many of the mysteries that face our planet. Instead of relying on ancient or contemporary wisdom, or the knowledge of isolated experts, we are building a global network of seekers from all walks of life, from all parts of the world, lay people and professionals alike, that can pool talents, experience, and resources to answer humankind's fundamental questions. We also believe that our planet is passing through a time of profound change and are seeking to create a global community of like-minded people that can safely pass through whatever changes may come our way and help give birth to a new way of life on our planet.

------------

Appreciate NHNE? Want to support our work? You can become a Friend of NHNE by making regular monthly donations (whatever you can afford) or yearly donations (120.00 or more). Contributions will be tax-deductable once NHNE has received non-profit status. Payments can be made by credit card, money order, or check. Checks and money orders can be sent to our regular mail address (listed above). Credit card numbers can be called in to our office (928) 282-6120, or sent via email to:

"friendsofnhne@nhne.com"

Along with receiving everything we email to the general readership, Friends of NHNE are placed on a special NHNE mailing list that receives information about behind-the-scenes activities, developing NHNE stories, potential job opportunities with NHNE, future NHNE inspired and/or supported projects, and other insider news.

For information about how you can sponsor one or more of our online publications -- Smorgasbord, News Updates, News Flashes, NHNE Updates, Special Reports, Interviews -- send an email to "nhne@nhne.com" with "Send Sponsor Info" in the SUBJECT FIELD of your message.

You can also support NHNE by purchasing books through Amazon.com. Simply use this URL to go to Amazon.com and then track down whatever book(s) you are interested in:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect-home/newheavenneweart

------------

Did a friend forward you this NHNE News Update? You can receive your own copy via email by writing to "nhne@nhne.com" and asking to be placed on our mailing list.

 


Return to Fast-Breaking News & Updates Archive